A Brief History Lesson

The United States may be a young country, but our colorful past has been dotted with a number of exciting periods of growth and upheaval. Focusing on a particular movement whose history would be beneficial to understand when designing future plans would be environmentalism; it may be one of the most interesting cultural shifts seen in the recent past of the American psyche. Let's jump back to the early 1900s when environmental reformists were some the top dogs in the political arena. Arguably one of the first and most influential advocates for stewardship, or "wise use", was Teddy Roosevelt. He, with the help of John Muir, pushed for the preservation of unspoiled wilderness for future generations to enjoy. He set the stage for future reformers with the laws and bureaus he created during his presidency.


via The Washington Post Archives
I was pleased to find many sources reported Roosevelt's respect for nature to be genuine. His actions coincide with his political leanings, as was depicted in the Washington Post's political cartoon seen to the left (14 Nov 1902). 
While on a hunting trip, Theodore Roosevelt declines to shoot a youngling tied to tree. Fun fact: Many believe this comic may have inspired the public's nickname of "Teddy", since he doesn't enjoy killing baby animals. Just like a teddy bear.


What I did not know before this project was that dams had been been built by the federal government far before the environmental movements of the early 1900s. Their history in the US goes back to the 1820s, when the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers designed and built a multitude dams to improve navigation on the Ohio River.  Their work then expanded to storage dams along the upper Mississippi river after the Civil War.  In 1902 Congress established the Bureau of Reclamation, which played a dramatic role in the influx of federal funding for dam construction. For the next few decades a large number of Bureau of Reclamation dams dotted the West coast. 


A map showing the ~100 dams considered for future removal plans
These two organizations, the Reclamation and the Corps, have built the majority of major federal dams seen in the United States.  These dams serve a wide variety of purposes from hydroelectric power sources to flood protection.  Most dams funded by the Bureau of Reclamation primarily functioned as water storage and delivery requirements. Conversely, U.S.A.C. of Engineers dams come with important secondary functions. On their website's mission statement they clearly state their designs intend to incorporate "management of the Nation’s water resources, protection and management of the natural environment, restoration of aquatic ecosystems, flood risk and emergency management, [and] military and civil engineering technical service".  


While the principles of dam construction written above may be stated without guile, here are some current statistics provided by the American Society of Civil Engineers:


Statistics like these do a wondrous job of highlighting one of the many factors needed to be considered when planning in the future. Economics play in a important role in what gets funded and what doesn't. Over the past few decades dams have not received the necessary upkeep, and we're now standing at a crossroad: spend the money to repair and sustainably redesign dams or remove them and find a new energy source? Where would our money be better spent?


8 comments:

  1. This comment has been removed by the author.

    ReplyDelete
  2. I think you should put the citations on their own page, and not on the top of every page. I like the layout of your webpage. There are some grammatical errors on the first page, such as there/their and some disagreeing tenses. Besides that, it looks like an interesting topic, but hard to see the whole picture since there is not much done so far!

    -Jamie Bottman

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Heya Jamie,

      Thanks for viewing my website, I'm in the middle of remodeling the information I've gathered right now so all my pages besides my homepage look a little sparse.
      I'd really appreciate it tho if you feel so inclined to read my homepage posting and see what you think.

      Thanks again!

      Hillary

      Delete
  3. Hi Hamish. I think this blog has some potential cool aspects, however I am not sure exactly where you are headed with everything yet. It is difficult to see exactly what this is all about. However, you have some excellent questions posed, I look forward to seeing them answered.

    - Cory Kowalik

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Thanks Cory!

      I'd really appreciate if you'd read my homepage article that I've completed. Maybe that'd clear some things up? :)
      And any constructive criticism for my writing style (etc) would be much great!

      Hillary

      Delete
  4. This site has some great images and an interesting layout. The first page was charismatic and easy to read/understand. I think the questions in place get at the core of the issue and that the site will be successful if you can answer all of them. One thing I might interested in with this issue is the fact that hydroelectric power makes up the vast majority of US "green" energy. This creates complexity around the issue and begs the question of which, of green energy or riverine ecosystems, is more important?

    Excellent start,
    Lucy Nepstad

    ReplyDelete
  5. I thought that you had a good layout and a lot of good info and pictures. You asked a lot of questions though and did not answer any of them. So I believe that if you attempted to answer some of them, then it would make your site a lot better. Also I do not remember recalling where you state dams are detrimental. You ask that question in the title or heading but don’t show how it may be detrimental. Also you give a bunch of links but I think these links should have some kind of description so people know what each site has to offer. Keep up the good work.
    -Quang Nguyen

    ReplyDelete
  6. I really like the layout of your website. The visual aids are very nice and I feel really contribute to the website as a whole. I like where you are going with this topic as the issue of dams is an important one. I would like to see your questions answered and more comments on the data as opposed to just posting links. I know you're still in the process of working on this though and looks good so far!

    ReplyDelete